In 2015, controversy over the Dietary Guidelines for Americans reached a new level when the government-appointed Dietary Guidance Advisory Committee (DGAC) recommended that those guidelines promote more sustainable diets, particularly those lower in animal-based foods. Although the committee found ample scientific evidence that such a shift would be a “win-win” for Americans' health as well as the environment, it met with fierce opposition on both counts, and not only from the livestock industry. This suggests how sustainable diet guidance poses a classic wicked problem, meaning one characterized by high levels of complexity, uncertainty, and epistemological conflict. While relationships between food, bodies, and environments are inevitably complex and uncertain, the controversy surrounding DGAC's recommendation offers an opportunity to explore how the scientific evidence on dietary sustainability is actually produced, and how it does or does not speak to other knowledge about eating for bodily and ecological health. To do this I look first at the research behind DGAC's endorsement of diets high in plant-based versus animal-based foods, and then at select responses in the public comments. The contrast not only highlights the incommensurability of modeled versus experiential evidence, but also suggests that efforts to promote more sustainable food consumption cannot credibly ignore questions (however unresolved) about what constitutes more sustainable production.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2016
Research Article|
May 01 2016
Wicked Nutrition: The Controversial Greening of Official Dietary Guidance
Susanne Freidberg
Susanne Freidberg
Dartmouth College
Susanne Freidberg is Professor of Geography at Dartmouth College. She is the author of French Beans and Food Scares: Culture and Commerce in an Anxious Age (Oxford University Press, 2004) and Fresh: A Perishable History (Belknap Press, 2009).
Search for other works by this author on:
Gastronomica (2016) 16 (2): 69–80.
Citation
Susanne Freidberg; Wicked Nutrition: The Controversial Greening of Official Dietary Guidance. Gastronomica 1 May 2016; 16 (2): 69–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2016.16.2.69
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.