In a funding environment where commercial collaboration and “user engagement” are increasingly encouraged, this paper explores the ethical, political, and methodological challenges of various forms of partnership between academic researchers and food businesses. Drawing on two recently completed projects, the paper assesses the variable “power-geometry” of such partnerships, including the process of negotiating access, securing informed consent, and conducting and disseminating the research. The paper distinguishes between publicly funded academic research, where independence is more easily maintained, and market research and consultancy, where conflicts of interest are more likely to arise. Commercial collaboration is academically valuable in providing access to data and insights that are not publicly available, but can be treacherous if researchers are unaware of the uneven power-geometry of such partnerships.
The Power-geometry of Food Business Research
Peter Jackson is Professor of Human Geography at the University of Sheffield where he is currently leading an ERA-Net project on convenience food. He previously directed the “Changing Families, Changing Food” program, funded by the Leverhulme Trust, and recently completed a project on consumer anxieties about food, funded by the European Research Council. He co-edited the Handbook of Food Research and is the author of Food Words (2013) and Anxious Appetites (2015), all published by Bloomsbury.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Peter Jackson; The Power-geometry of Food Business Research. Gastronomica 1 August 2015; 15 (3): 47–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2015.15.3.47
Download citation file: