Skip to Main Content
Umbrella Alt Text
header search
Search
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Volume 4, Issue 4
January 1992
Issue Cover
ISSN 1053-9867
EISSN 1533-8363
In this Issue

Turmoil over Relevant Conduct in the Ninth Circuit

Front Matter
View Articletitled, Front Matter
Open the PDF for in another window
Editors' Notes
View Articletitled, Editors' Notes
Open the PDF for in another window
Correspondence
Paul Martin
View Articletitled, Correspondence
Open the PDF for in another window
Bibliography of Recent Materials on Sentencing
View Articletitled, Bibliography of Recent Materials on Sentencing
Open the PDF for in another window
Back Matter
View Articletitled, Back Matter
Open the PDF for in another window

Commentary

Relevant Conduct and Plea Bargaining
Steven E. Zipperstein
View Articletitled, Relevant Conduct and Plea Bargaining
Open the PDF for in another window
Sentencing Narcotics Cases Where Drug Amount Is a Poor Indicator of Relative Culpability
Catharine M. Goodwin
View Articletitled, Sentencing Narcotics Cases Where Drug Amount Is a Poor Indicator of Relative Culpability
Open the PDF for in another window
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
Robert S. Mueller,, III
View Articletitled, Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
Open the PDF for in another window
Response to William W. Wilkins, Jr., Chairman of the Sentencing Commission
Gerald W. Heaney
View Articletitled, Response to William W. Wilkins, Jr., Chairman of the Sentencing Commission
Open the PDF for in another window
The Sentencing Guidelines Subcommittee of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee
Robert H. Edmunds,, Jr.
View Articletitled, The Sentencing Guidelines Subcommittee of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee
Open the PDF for in another window
Proposed 1992 Guideline Amendments
Ronald Weich
View Articletitled, Proposed 1992 Guideline Amendments
Open the PDF for in another window

Guest Editor's Observations

The Ninth Circuit's Undeclared War on "Real Offense" Factors and Relevant Conduct
Roger W. Haines,, Jr.
View Articletitled, The Ninth Circuit's Undeclared War on "Real Offense" Factors and Relevant Conduct
Open the PDF for in another window
The Real Issue: Fair Plea Bargains, Not Relevant Conduct
Judy Clarke
View Articletitled, The Real Issue: Fair Plea Bargains, Not Relevant Conduct
Open the PDF for in another window

Opinion

United States v. Jesus Castro-Cervantes, 927 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir. August 9, 1990) (1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23239)
John T. Noonan,, Jr.
View Articletitled, United States v. Jesus Castro-Cervantes, 927 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir. August 9, 1990) (1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23239)
Open the PDF for in another window
United States v. Leon Brady, 928 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. March 18, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4187)
Harry Pregerson, Wallace
View Articletitled, United States v. Leon Brady, 928 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. March 18, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4187)
Open the PDF for in another window
United States v. Lawrence Dean Faulkner, 934 F.2d 190 (9th Cir. May 13, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9298)
Betty B. Fletcher
View Articletitled, United States v. Lawrence Dean Faulkner, 934 F.2d 190 (9th Cir. May 13, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9298)
Open the PDF for in another window
United States v. Robert John Newbert, No. 90-50642 (9th Cir. December 20, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29496)
Thomas G. Nelson
View Articletitled, United States v. Robert John Newbert, No. 90-50642 (9th Cir. December 20, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29496)
Open the PDF for in another window
United States v. Robert Fine, 946 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. October 1, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22530)
William A. Norris
View Articletitled, United States v. Robert Fine, 946 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. October 1, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22530)
Open the PDF for in another window
United States v. Mohammad Azeem, 946 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. September 30, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22961)
Joseph T. Sneed
View Articletitled, United States v. Mohammad Azeem, 946 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. September 30, 1991) (1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22961)
Open the PDF for in another window
All Issues
Booker Is the Fix
The Evolving Role of the United States Sentencing Commission
Intrigue at the U.S. Sentencing Commission: The Battle Over Part-Time Commissioners
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Revisited
Did Booker Increase Disparity? Why the Evidence Is Unpersuasive
  • Online ISSN 1533-8363
  • Print ISSN 1053-9867
  • Copyright © 2025
Stay Informed
Sign up for eNews
Disciplines

Courses

Products

Resources

Support Us

About UC Press

Contact Us

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept