Skip to Main Content
University of California Press Logo Open Menu
header search
Search
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Volume 35, Issue 3
February 2023
Federal Sentencing Reporter Cover Image for Volume 35, Issue 3
ISSN 1053-9867
EISSN 1533-8363

Sentencing Law and Practice Move Forward

Editor’s Observations

Life in the Fast Lane: Dynamic Sentencing Developments across the Nation
Steven L. Chanenson
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

New Justice Department Charging, Plea, and Sentencing Policies

More Justice from Justice: The DOJ’s Latest Charging, Plea, and Sentencing Policies
Alan Vinegrad, Douglas A. Berman
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors, General Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing
U.S. Attorney General
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors, Additional Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing in Drug Cases
U.S. Attorney General
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

The Future of Compassionate Release

Putting the “Compassion” in Compassionate Release: The Need for a Policy Statement Codifying Judicial Discretion
Erica Zunkel, Jaden M. Lessnick
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
The United States Sentencing Commission, Compassionate Release, and Judicial Discretion: The 2022–2023 Amendment Cycle
Mary Price
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
The Door Is Still Open: Compassionate Release and the Aging Prisoner
E. Katharine Tinto
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Proposed Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines (preliminary)
U.S. Sentencing Commission
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Report to the House of Delegates and Resolution (adopted)
American Bar Association
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

Reflections on Work by State Sentencing Commissions

Reassessing, Rethinking, Revising: The Essential Work of Sentencing Commissions
Kelly Lyn Mitchell
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Change Management in an Indeterminate Sentencing System
Mark H. Bergstrom, Ryan S. Meyers
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
All Issues
Booker Is the Fix
The Evolving Role of the United States Sentencing Commission
Intrigue at the U.S. Sentencing Commission: The Battle Over Part-Time Commissioners
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Revisited
Did Booker Increase Disparity? Why the Evidence Is Unpersuasive
  • Online ISSN 1533-8363
  • Print ISSN 1053-9867
  • Copyright © 2025
Stay Informed
Sign up for eNews
Disciplines

Courses

Products

Resources

Support Us

About UC Press

Contact Us

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept