Skip to Main Content

Close

UCPRESS
ABOUT US
BLOG
SUPPORT US
CONTACT US

header search

search input Search input auto suggest

filter your search

Search

Menu

Content
Purchase
Alerts
Submit
Info For
About

Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Select Year

Issue

Volume 28, Issue 3

February 2016

ISSN 1053-9867

EISSN 1533-8363

In this Issue

Editor’s Observations
Judicial Discretion
Statement of Reasons
Disparity
Reform
Special Topic: Johnson V. United States

Sentencing a Decade after Booker

Editor’s Observations

A Booker Effect?

Jelani Jefferson Exum, Paul J. Hofer, J.D. Ph.D.

Judicial Discretion

The Discretion to Sentence

Robert Pratt

Judicial Discretion in Federal Sentencing—Real or Imagined?

Judge Nancy Gertner

Foreword to Judge Arthur Tarnow’s Special Notes

Jelani Jefferson Exum

Special Notes—Criminal—Practice Guidelines

Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

Statement of Reasons

The Evolution of the Statement of Reasons Form

Jelani Jefferson Exum, Paul J. Hofer, J.D. Ph.D.

The Importance of Statements of Reasons in Guideline Sentencing

Toby D. Slawsky

Statement of Reasons, AO 245B (Rev. 10/15)

Letter to Judge Patti B. Saris, Revised Statement of Reasons

Decision, United States v. Pruitt

Disparity

Federal Sentencing Disparity: 2005-2012 (Summary)

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics

Review of DOJ-Commissioned Report: Racial Disparity in Post-Booker Sentencing

Paul J. Hofer, J.D. Ph. D.

Response to Paul Hofer

William Rhodes, Ryan Kling, Jeremy Luallen, Christina Dyous

The Debate Continues

Paul J. Hofer, J.D. PH. D., William Rhodes

Reform

A Commentary on Judicial Discretion, Mandatory Minimums, and Sentencing Reform

Jelani Jefferson Exum

Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2014

United States Sentencing Commission

Quick Facts: Mandatory Minimum Penalties

United States Sentencing Commission

Sentencing Reform: Let’s Keep What We Know Works and Avoid What We Know Fails

William Otis

Taking a Closer Look: A Case for Sentencing Reform

Jalila Jefferson-Bullock

Special Topic: Johnson V. United States

Using the Supreme Court’s Original Habeas Jurisdiction to “Ma[k]e” New Rules Retroactive

Stephen I. Vladeck

Cover Image

Cover Image
Front Matter

Email alerts

Latest Issue Alert

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

Reenvisioning Success: How a Federal Reentry Court Promotes Desistance and Improves Quality of Life

A Tale of Two Districts: Supervised Release in the District of Arizona and the Northern District of California

The Judicial Role in Supervision and Reentry

The Burden of Criminal Justice Debt in Federal Community Supervision

One Nation Under Supervision

Recent Content
Browse Issues
All Content
Purchase

Alerts
Submit
Info for Authors
Info for Librarians

About
Editorial Team
Contact Us

Online ISSN 1533-8363
Print ISSN 1053-9867
Copyright © 2022

Stay Informed

Sign up for eNews

Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn

Visit the UC Press Blog

Disciplines

Ancient World
Anthropology
Art
Communication
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Film & Media Studies
Food & Wine
History
Music
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Browse All Disciplines

Courses

Browse All Courses

Products

Books
Journals

Resources

Book Authors
Booksellers
Instructions
Journal Authors
Journal Editors
Librarians
Media & Journalists

Support Us

Endowments
Membership
Planned Giving
Supporters

About UC Press

Careers
Location
Press Releases
Seasonal Catalog

Contact Us

Acquisitions Editors
Customer Service
Exam/Desk Requests
Media Inquiries
Print-Disability
Rights & Permissions
Royalties
UC Press Foundation

© Copyright 2021 by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Privacy policy Accessibility

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.

Accept