Skip to Main Content
University of California Press Logo Open Menu
header search
Search
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Volume 14, Issue 3-4
December 2001
Federal Sentencing Reporter Cover Image for Volume 14, Issue 3-4
ISSN 1053-9867
EISSN 1533-8363
In this Issue

Drug Sentencing: The State of the Debate in 2002

Editor's Note

The Geology of Drug Policy in 2002
Frank O. Bowman, III
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Everybody Knows It, But Is It True? A Challenge to the Conventional Wisdom that the War on Drugs Is Ineffective
Stephen D. Easton
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Are the Drug Wars De-Escalating? Where to Look for Evidence
Ronald F. Wright
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Did the War on Drugs Die with the Birth of the War on Terrorism?: A Closer Look at Civil Forfeiture and Racial Profiling After 9/11
Sandra Guerra Thompson
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
The Impact of Changes in Federal Law and Policy on the Sentencing of, and Time Served in Prison by, Drug Defendants Convicted in U.S. District Courts
John Scalia
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Differential Usage of Guideline Standards by Defendant Race and Gender in Federal Drug Sentences: Fact or Fiction?
Paula Kautt
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Acceptance of Responsibility and Conspiracy Sentences in Drug Prosecutions After Apprendi
Nancy J. King, Susan R. Klein
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
The Rehabilitative Ideal and the Drug Court Reality
Morris B. Hoffman
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Drug Courts Work
William G. Meyer, A. William Ritter
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
A Reply to Messrs. Meyer and Ritter
Morris B. Hoffman
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
U.S. Sentencing Commission Requests for Comment on Drug Sentencing Guidelines, January 2002
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
U.S. Sentencing Commission Hearing, 2/25/02: Cocaine Pharmacology, ““Crack Babies,”” Violence
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Letter from Rep. Lamar Smith, Chairman, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, House Judiciary Committee, to Diana E. Murphy, Chair, U.S. Sentencing Commission
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Practitioners' Advisory Group Comment on Crack-Powder Ratio
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
2002 Amendments to Federal Drug Sentencing Guidelines
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Statement of Charles Tetzlaff General Counsel, United States Sentencing Commission to House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
Statement of Diana E. Murphy Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission Before Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs, May 22, 2002
View Articletitled, SCM.SharedControls.Infrastructure.TitleDisplayModel?.Text
Open the PDF for in another window
All Issues
Booker Is the Fix
The Evolving Role of the United States Sentencing Commission
Intrigue at the U.S. Sentencing Commission: The Battle Over Part-Time Commissioners
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Revisited
Did Booker Increase Disparity? Why the Evidence Is Unpersuasive
  • Online ISSN 1533-8363
  • Print ISSN 1053-9867
  • Copyright © 2025
Stay Informed
Sign up for eNews
Disciplines

Courses

Products

Resources

Support Us

About UC Press

Contact Us

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal