Notes

Notes
1
An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (sentencing) and Other Acts in Conquence Thereof, S.C. 1995, c.22.
Julian Roberts & Andrew von Hirsch, Statutory Sentencing Reform: The Purpose and Principles of Sentencing, 37 Crim. L.Q. 220 (1995).
3
Alan Young, The Role of An Appellate Court in Developing Sentencing Guidelines (a research study prepared for the Canadian Sentencing Commission) (Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada, 1988).
4
id.
Peter McCormick, Sentence Appeals to the Alberta Court of Appeal, 1985-1992: A Statistical Analysis of the Laycraft Court, 31 Alta. L.R. 624 (1993).
Regina v. Jackson (1994), 87 C.C.C. (3d) 56 (Sask. C.A.)
7
Regina v. Gardiner (1982), 68 C.C.C. (2d) 477 (S.C.C.).
8
Regina v. Lyons (1987), 61 CR. (3d) 1 (S.C.C.)
Regina v. Smith (1987), 58 C.R. (3d) 193 (S.C.C.)
Regina v. Goltz (1991), 8 CR. (4th) 82 (S.C.C.)
9
Regina v. Brown (1991), 6 CR. (3d) 353 (S.C.C.)
Regina v. J.J.M. (1993), 20 CR. (4th) 295
Young Offenders Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. Y-1
10
(1996), 43 C.R. (4th) 269 (S.C.C).
11
(1996), 46 C.R. (4th) 269 (S.C.C).
12
116 S.Ct. 2035 (1996).
13
Gary T. Trotter, Regina v. Shropshire: Murder, Sentencing and the Supreme Court of Canada, 43 C.R. (4th) 288 (19%)
Tim Quigley, New Honzons in Sentencing?, 1 Can. Crim. L.R. 278, 280 (1996).
14
Regina v. Dunn (1995), 95 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (S.C.C.)
17
(1996), 43 C.R. (4th) 269, 287 (S.C.C.).
18
The Report of Canadian Sentencing Commission, Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach (Ottawa: The Commission, 1987)
19
Quigley, supra note 13, at 281
Trotter, supra note 13, at 296.
20
John Norris, Sentencing for Second Degree Murder: Regina v. Shropshire, 1 Can. Crim. L.R. 199 (1996).
21
(1996), 43 C.R. (4th) 269, 315 (S.C.C).
22
Id. at 319.
23
Norris, supra note 18.
24
Mistretta v. U.S., 109 S. Ct. 647 (1989).
Trotter, supra note 13, at 299-305.
25
Andrew J. Ashworth, Sentencing in England: The Struggle for Supremacy, 7 Fed. Sent. R. 281 (1995).
26
Regina v. Priest (1996), 110 C.C.C(3d) 289, 299
Regina v. F.S.A. (1996), 109 C.C.C. (3d) 427
United States v. Rybicki, 93 F.3d 754 (4th Cir. 1996)
Kate Stith, The Hegemony of the Sentencing Commission, 9 Fed. Sent. R. 14 (1996).
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview