Footnotes

Footnotes
1
873 F.2d 437, 443 (1st Cir. 1989)
2
Id. at 443.
3
Id. at 443.
4
Id. at 444
United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Or. 1984)
5
Id. at 444.
6
Id. at 444
Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552 (1988)
7
United States v. Pilgrim Market, 944 F.2d 14, 17 (1st Cir. 1991)
8
United States v. Garcia, 954 F.2d 12, 16 (1st Cir. 1992)
United States v. Tabares, 951 F.2d 405, 409 (1st Cir. 1991) (similar).
9
United States v. Newman, 982 F.2d 665 (1st Cir. 1992)
U.S.S.G. §2A2.2
United States v. Jimenez-Otero, 898 F.2d 813, 814-15 (1st Cir. 1990)
United States v. Preakos, 907 R2d 7, 8 (1st 1990)
U.S.S.G. §§2D1.1(b)(1) and 3B1.1(a)
United States v. Paulino, 887 F.2d 358 (1st Cir. 1989) (sentence enhancement under §2D1.1(b)(1)).
10
United States v. Pineda, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32213, *11 (1st Cir. 1992)
11
United States v. Mariano, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1552 (1st Cir. 1993) (interpreting §2X5.1).
12
Francesca Bowman, The Greening of Probation Offic- ers in Their New Role, 4 Fed. Sent. R. 99 (1991)
13
874 F.2d 43, 49 (1st Cir. 1989).
14
United States v. Polanco-Reynoso, 924 F.2d 23, 24 (1st Cir. 1991) (summarizing holding in Diaz-Villafane).
15
United States v. Jones, 948 F.2d 732, 736 (D.C Cir. 1991)
United States v. Holmes, 975 F.2d 275, 283 (6th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Joan, 883 F.2d 491, 494 (6th Cir. 1989)
United States v. Lara-Banda, 972 F.2d 958, 959-60 (8th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Williams, 922 F.2d 578, 581 (10th Cir. 1990).
16
United States v. Lira-Barraza, 941 F.2d 745, 746 (9th Cir. 1991)
Bruce M. Selya and Matthew R. Kipp, An Examination of Emerging Departure Jurisprudence Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 67 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1 (1991).
17
874 F.2d at 49 (emphasis added).
18
United States v. Williams, 891 F.2d 962 (1st Cir. 1989)
United States v. Pozzy, 902 F.2d 133 (1st Cir. 1990)
United States v. Studley, 907 F.2d 254 (1st Cir. 1990)
United States v. Deane, 914 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1990)
United States v. Sklar, 920 F.2d 107 (1st Cir. 1990)
United States v. Norflett, 922 F.2d 50 (1st Cir. 1990)
United States v. Valencia-Lucena, 925 F.2d 506 (1st Cir. 1991)
United States v. Can, 932 F.2d 67 (1st Cir. 1991)
United States v. Wogan, 938 F.2d 1446 (1st Cir. 1991)
United States v. Delloiacono, 900 F.2d 481 (1st Cir. 1990)
U.S.S.G. §5C2.1(c)
Francesca Bowman, The Greening of Probation Officers in Their New Role, 4 Fed. Sent. R. 99 (1991)
United States v. Gregorio, 956 F.2d 341 (1st Cir. 1992)
United States v. Russell, 870 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1989)
19
920 F.2d 107 (1st Cir. 1990).
20
Id. at 117.
21
Id at 116.
18 U.S.C. §2252(a)
22
975 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1992).
23
Id. at 948 (emphasis added).
25
Francesca Bowman, Commission, Congress Taking Dis- parate Paths, Mass. L. Wkly. 11 (May 18, 1992)
Daniel J. Freed and Marc Miller, Departures Visible and Invisible: Perpetuating Variation in Federal Sentences, 5 Fed. Sent. R. 3 (1992)
26
18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e)(3) and (f)(2).
S. Rep. No. 225, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 80 (1983), reprinted in 1984 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3182, 263
William W. Wilkins, Jr., Sentencing Reform and Appellate Review, 46 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 429, 441-42 (1989)
27
Daniel J. Freed, Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion ofSentencers, 101 Yale L. J. 1681, 1735 (1992)
Daniel J. Freed and Marc Miller, Honoring Judi- cial Discretion Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 3 Fed. Sent. R. 235 (1991)
28
874 F.2d at 52
U.S.S.G. §1 A.4(b)
Freed, supra note 27, at 1735.
S. Rep. No. 225, supra note 26, at 151, reprinted in 1984 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 3334.
United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1112, 1121 (1992)
29
964 F.2d 66, 75 (1st Cir. 1992)
United States v. Polanco-Reynoso, 924 F.2d 23,25 (1st Cir. 1991)
United States v. Tabares, 951 F.2d 405, 411 (1st Cir. 1991)
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview