Footnotes

Footnotes
1
Gerald W. Heaney, "The Reality of Guidelines Sentencing: No End to Disparity," 28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 161, 188 (1991).
2
S.Rep. No. 98-225 at 38.
3
Id. at 41.
4
note 1, supra
5
28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at 190.
6
Id. at 196.
7
Young, "Rethinking the Commission's Drug Guidelines: Courier Cases Where Quantity Overstates Culpability," 3 Fed. Sent. R. 63, 65 (Sept./Oct. 1990)
Pilchen, "The Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Undercover Sting Operations: A Defense Perspective," 4 Fed. Sent. R. 115 (Sept./Oct. 1991)
8
28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at 165.
9
United States v. Broxton, 926 F.2d 1180, 1183-84 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
10
United States Sentencing Commission, Special Report to Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System (Aug. 1991).
11
United States v. Halford,—F.2d—, 1991 WL 214844 n.4 (8th Cir. Oct. 25, 1991).
12
28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at 220.
13
United States Sentencing Commission, Supplementary Report on the Initial Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements at 48, 54 (June 18, 1987).
14
United States v. Vega-Encarnacion, 914 F.2d 20, 25 (1st Cir. 1990)
15
Guidelines §1 A4(c), p.s.
16
28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at pp. 206-07.
17
Id. at 205.
18
Id. at 203.
19
28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at 205-06 (footnote omitted)
State v. Russell, File No. 89067067 (Hennepin County, Minn. Dist. Ct. Dec. 19, 1990)
Id., Supplemental Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law (Jan. 29, 1991)
"Penalties for Crack Use Show Bias, Court Decides," Miami Herald, A20 (Dec. 14, 1991)
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview