The topic of alternatives to incarceration often seems at once forgotten and yet ever-present in the federal sentencing system. U.S. Sentencing Commission data indicate nine out of every ten federal sentences include terms of imprisonment, and yet the offenses and offenders in the federal system ought to permit great use of alternatives. This issue of FSR seeks to bring new attention to these topics, largely though the materials emerging from the Center for Justice and Human Dignity’s October 2023 “Rewriting the Sentence II Summit.” This event at George Washington University aspired to highlight how the full array of practitioners — judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys and other sentencing system actors — could make meaningful commitments to alternative to incarceration practices. This introductory essay provides context and framing for the materials that follow.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2024
Editorial|
February 01 2024
A New Alternatives Agenda for the U.S. Sentencing Commission?
Douglas A. Berman
Douglas A. Berman
Co–Managing Editor, FSR
Newton D. Baker-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Search for other works by this author on:
Federal Sentencing Reporter (2024) 36 (3): 111–113.
Citation
Douglas A. Berman; A New Alternatives Agenda for the U.S. Sentencing Commission?. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 February 2024; 36 (3): 111–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2024.36.3.111
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.