Cash bail payments are generally imposed to ensure an individual appears in court after arrest. Lesser known is the practice of bond conversion, wherein bond money is held to pay for legal financial obligations if the individual is found guilty. Procedural justice theory is a useful framework for understanding bail processes. Individuals subject to bond conversion may experience distrust towards a system whose policies are not transparent, potentially reducing compliance with the law. We conduct an assessment of statutes relevant to bond conversion for all 50 states and the US Code. Nearly half of all states and the US Code permit bond conversion via statute; statutes most often authorize conversion to pay for fines, costs, and restitution; most do not require the depositor be given notice, do not include language making exceptions for low-income individuals, and do not exclude third parties. Suggestions for future research on bond conversion are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December-February 2022
Research Article|
February 01 2022
The Hidden Practice of Utilizing Bonds to Cover Legal Financial Obligations
Carmen L. Diaz,
Carmen L. Diaz
Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University Bloomington
Search for other works by this author on:
Michelle Ying,
Michelle Ying
Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University Bloomington
Search for other works by this author on:
Miriam Northcutt Bohmert,
Miriam Northcutt Bohmert
Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University Bloomington
Search for other works by this author on:
Jessica Meckes,
Jessica Meckes
Department of Criminal Justice, Morningside University
Search for other works by this author on:
Mitchell Farrell
Mitchell Farrell
Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University Bloomington
Search for other works by this author on:
Federal Sentencing Reporter (2022) 34 (2-3): 119–127.
Citation
Carmen L. Diaz, Michelle Ying, Miriam Northcutt Bohmert, Jessica Meckes, Mitchell Farrell; The Hidden Practice of Utilizing Bonds to Cover Legal Financial Obligations. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 February 2022; 34 (2-3): 119–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2022.34.2-3.119
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.