Human dignity plays a central and constitutive role within the German and Dutch criminal justice systems. It influences not only the overall approach to, and accepted purpose of, punishment, but also the types of sanctions that are typically doled out, the setup of their prisons, and the conditions in which prisoners find themselves once in custody. Although human dignity is not the paramount value in the American criminal justice system, this article contends that recent criminal justice reform efforts implicate human dignity into system practices to a greater degree than ever before. While the reform efforts are prompted by a concern for efficiency and efficacy, policymakers are increasingly relying on research that indicates that more humane and individualized treatment of offenders is a key component to achieving desired public safety outcomes. The article starts with a brief discussion of how human dignity became a central value of the European system and contrasts this with the historically weaker sway human dignity has played in the American system. It then demonstrates that the principle of human dignity is gaining influence through recent legislative reform efforts in the United States as well as changes in correctional training and supervision practices.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2014
Research Article|
October 01 2014
Doing the Right Thing: The Evolving Role of Human Dignity in American Sentencing and Corrections
Alison Shames,
Alison Shames
Independent Consultant, formerly Associate Director, Center on Sentencing and Corrections, Vera Institute of Justice
Search for other works by this author on:
Ram Subramanian
Ram Subramanian
Senior Program Associate, Center on Sentencing and Corrections, Vera Institute of Justice
Search for other works by this author on:
Federal Sentencing Reporter (2014) 27 (1): 9–18.
Citation
Alison Shames, Ram Subramanian; Doing the Right Thing: The Evolving Role of Human Dignity in American Sentencing and Corrections. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 October 2014; 27 (1): 9–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.27.1.9
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.