The best post-Booker strategy for the U.S. Sentencing Commission is to do nothing. The pre-Booker guidelines were too rigid, too harsh, and, for those reasons, too often circumvented. Post-Booker, the federal guidelines provide a framework and starting points for sentencing and plea bargaining which should produce reasonable consistency within individual district courts. Different sentencing patterns between districts, and significant differences between regions of the country are inevitable and produce far less injustice than did the pre-Booker guidelines.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 2012
The U.S. Sentencing Commission's Best Response to Booker Is to Do Nothing
Federal Sentencing Reporter (2012) 24 (5): 387–393.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Michael Tonry; The U.S. Sentencing Commission's Best Response to Booker Is to Do Nothing. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 June 2012; 24 (5): 387–393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2012.24.5.387
Download citation file: