These Editor's Observations introduce Volume 24, Number 5 of the Federal Sentencing Reporter, an issue devoted to renewed discussion in Congress and the U.S. Sentencing Commission about whether there is a need for legislative action to revise or replace the advisory federal sentencing guidelines system judicially created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 decision in United States v. Booker. It describes the basic positions of the main institutional actors, briefly summarizes the articles in the issue, and makes a prediction about the likelihood of action in the near term.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 2012
It's Alive! The Federal Booker-Fix Debate Stirs
Federal Sentencing Reporter (2012) 24 (5): 335–337.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Frank O. Bowman, III; It's Alive! The Federal Booker-Fix Debate Stirs. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 June 2012; 24 (5): 335–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2012.24.5.335
Download citation file: