Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act was well aimed or effective is a challenging question. Advertised as stemming a flood of trivial prisoners' lawsuits in the federal courts, the PLRA erected obstacles to serious as well as frivolous complaints – like claims of racial discrimination or sexual abuse by prison staff that leaves no physical injury. And much of the time saved by dismissing cases is spent interpreting the PLRA's perplexing procedural rules. More and more often, courts are leaving prisoners (and pretrial detainees) to the vagaries of cash-starved prison systems. The author brings her years as a prisoners' rights litigator and Pro Se Law Clerk to bear on the issue of whether, in these days of economic recession and mass incarceration, it is prison rather than prison litigation that is truly in need of reform.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2012
Research Article|
April 01 2012
Prison Litigation Reform Acts
Susan N. Herman
Susan N. Herman
Centennial Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
President, American Civil Liberties Union
Search for other works by this author on:
Federal Sentencing Reporter (2012) 24 (4): 263–267.
Citation
Susan N. Herman; Prison Litigation Reform Acts. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 April 2012; 24 (4): 263–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.263
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.