Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital SentencingAre Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?

Myers, Bryan; Weidemann, Emalee; Pearce, Gregory

doi:10.1525/fsr.2006.19.1.13

Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?

Bryan Myers,

Bryan Myers

Search for other works by this author on:

This Site

PubMed

Google Scholar

Emalee Weidemann,

Emalee Weidemann

Search for other works by this author on:

This Site

PubMed

Google Scholar

Gregory Pearce

Search for other works by this author on:

This Site

PubMed

Google Scholar

You do not currently have access to this content.

Don't already have an account? Register

You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.

Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?

Article PDF first page preview

Citing articles via

Email alerts

Stay Informed

Disciplines

Courses

Products

Resources

Support Us

About UC Press

Contact Us

Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?

Article PDF first page preview

Sign in

Client Account

Sign in via your Institution

Citing articles via

Email alerts

Stay Informed

Disciplines

Courses

Products

Resources

Support Us

About UC Press

Contact Us

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only