ABSTRACT Borrowing Bill Nichols' distinction between documen-tary film and reality TV, this piece evaluates Fahrenheit 9/11 in terms of its ““reactive politics.”” Although successful, the film's political ef-fectiveness is compromised by Michael Moore's celebrity. Unable to sustain the tropes of social solidarity of his earlier films, he resorts to strategies that ultimately undermine his political objectives.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.