Ruggiero's stated purpose is “… to expose … the mythology which surrounds the image of Italian American women …” through studies of Italian American women and the Italian American family in a “feminist framework.” These new studies would offer “feminist method and content” and new, unconventional methodologies would provide a “female corrective” to the “masculinist bias [found in] traditional ethnic studies scholarship.” Ruggiero's motives are laudable, but she fails to clarify either the “masculinist,” “sex-typed” view point she criticizes or the new “feminist” methodology she advocates. A “selected review” of “traditional literature” she offers by way of explanation becomes a rostrum for condemnation of the “masculinist” motives, methods, and conclusions in the works considered (by R. Gambino, H. Gans, B. B. Caroli, C. Mindel and R. W. Habenstein, and others).
Research Article| January 01 1986
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Gloria Eive; Critique [of Reclaiming the Subject: Italian Women Self-Defined by Chris Ruggiero]. Explorations in Ethnic Studies 1 January 1986; 9 (1): 36–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ees.19188.8.131.52
Download citation file: