We deployed a helicopter with an infrared optical gas imaging camera to detect hydrocarbon emissions from 3,428 oil and gas facilities (including 3,225 producing oil and gas well pads) in Utah’s Uinta Basin during winter and spring 2018. We also surveyed 419 of the same well pads from the ground. Winter conditions led to poor contrast between emission plumes and the ground, leading to a detection limit for the aerial survey that was between two and six times worse than a previous summertime survey. Because the ground survey was able to use the camera’s high-sensitivity mode, the rate of detected emission plumes was much higher in the ground survey (31% of all surveyed well pads) relative to the aerial survey (0.5%), but colder air temperatures appeared to impair plume detection in the ground survey as well. The aerial survey cost less per facility visited, but the ground survey cost less per emission plume detected. Well pads with detected emissions during the ground and aerial surveys had higher oil and gas production, were younger, were more likely to be oil well pads, and had more liquid storage tanks per pad relative to the entire surveyed population. The majority of observed emission plumes were from liquid storage tanks (75.9% of all observed plumes), including emissions from pressure relief valves and thief hatches on the tank or from piping that connects to the tank. Well pads with control devices to reduce emissions from tanks (combustors or vapor recovery units) were more likely to have detected emissions. This finding does not imply that the control devices themselves were not functioning properly. Instead, gas was escaping into the atmosphere before it reached control devices. Pads with control devices tended to be newer and have higher oil and gas production, which probably explains their higher rate of detected emissions.

Emissions from equipment leaks from process components, such as valves and flanges, were measured at 67 sites in the oil and natural gas production and gathering and boosting segments in four different onshore production basins in the western United States. Component counts were obtained from 65 of the 67 sites where nearly 84,000 monitored components resulted in a leak detection rate of 0.39% when detection results using both optical gas imaging (OGI) and a handheld flame ionization detector (FID) were combined. OGI techniques identified fewer leaks but greater total emissions than surveys using an FID operated in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Reference Method 21. Many of the leaks that were identified only with an FID were on the lower end of the emission rate distribution in this study. Conversely, OGI identified several components on the higher end of the study emission rate distribution that were not identified with FID-based methods. The most common EPA estimation method for greenhouse gas emission reporting for equipment leaks, which is based on major site equipment counts and population-average component emission factors, would have overestimated equipment leak emissions by 22% to 36% for the sites surveyed in this study as compared to direct measurements of leaking components because of a lower frequency of leaking components in this work than during the field surveys conducted more than 20 years ago to develop the current EPA factors. Results from this study further support emerging evidence that methane detection technologies for oil and gas applications should be evaluated on a different framework than a simple comparison of the counts of leaks detected.