This qualitative study, from the domestic adoptee perspective, reflects the analysis of thirty-seven online stories of adoptee-birth mother/family reunions. The present study contributes to existing literature on adoption reunion and extends understanding of adoption reconnection by focusing on the constitution of its meaning. Studies privileging meaning-making help unravel why certain outcomes emerge and emphasize the importance of communication in studying relationships. Framed by relational dialectics theory and examined using Baxter’s newly developed contrapuntal analysis, a dominant discursive struggle of romanticized versus pragmatic reconnection emerged. The discourse of romanticized reconnection emerged from two themes: (a) desire for physical resemblance and (b) immediate connection. Three themes constituted the discourse of pragmatic reconnection: (a) birth family as strangers, (b) desire for health information, and (c) connection not guaranteed. In addition, a hybrid utterance surfaced providing evidence of a phenomenon where new meanings are likely to emerge.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2013
This article was originally published in
Qualitative Communication Research
Research Article|
December 01 2013
Making Meaning of Domestic Adoption Reunion in Online Narratives: A Dialogic Perspective Available to Purchase
Kristina M. Scharp
Department of Communication Studies, University of Iowa.
Kristina M. Scharp, 105 Becker Communication Studies Building, Department of Communication Studies, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242. E-mail: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
Kristina M. Scharp, 105 Becker Communication Studies Building, Department of Communication Studies, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242. E-mail: [email protected].
Qualitative Communication Research (2013) 2 (3): 301–325.
Citation
Kristina M. Scharp; Making Meaning of Domestic Adoption Reunion in Online Narratives: A Dialogic Perspective. Qualitative Communication Research 1 December 2013; 2 (3): 301–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2013.2.3.301
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.