Figure 1. The National Forest Inventory cluster plots sampled for ferns in Papua New Guinea. More

Figure 2. Epiphytic and terrestrial fern species richness along the elevation gradient. More

Figure 3. Analysis of the total, terrestrial, and epiphytic fern richness over the elevation, established by fitting a Poisson generalized linear model. More

Figure 4. Comparison of fern richness among the lowland, disturbed (L), and pristine (P) forest and the pristine mountain forest (P). Box plots show the mean (bold line), the 25th and 75th percentile (box), the 95% confidence interval (whiskers), and outliers (dot). More

Figure 5. Similarity between each pair of plots plotted against their elevational difference. Each dot corresponds to the similarity calculated between each couple of plots. The regression line represents a generalized linear model fit. More

Figure 6. Scaling ordination to analyze the difference in genus composition among forest types and disturbance regimes. More

Figure 1. Map of Kenya indicating areas suitable for freshwater aquaculture (based on [ 32 ]). Green = high suitability; pink = medium suitability; yellow = low suitability. More

Figure 2. Survey respondents’ assessment of climatic hazards. More

Figure 3. Survey respondents’ assessment of impacts of climatic hazards on aquaculture. More

Figure 4. An abandoned fishpond because the owner couldn’t cope with the impacts of climate-related hazard. More

Figure 1. This diagram visualizes the concept of meaningful places and how they relate to and differ from a sense of place. Similar to a sense of place, for a place to become meaningful, both individual and collective processes are involved. While, for a sense of place, a person must have a person... More

Figure 2. This map of the research site illustrates the municipality Vechigen and the designated wind energy planning area as well as the 11 neighboring municipalities of Vechigen, whose residents were also asked to participate in the PPGIS and the online survey. The extent of the fishnet indicate... More

Figure 3. This illustrates the designated wind energy planning area and the mapped meaningful places of all participants, distinguishing between supporters, indifferently inclined people, and opponents. The first numbers of the classification refer to the map of all participants (large map) and th... More

Figure 4. This illustrates the first step of the agreement analysis involving the calculation of difference between the mapped meaningful places and the other mapped place types that were indicated as (1) suitable wind energy sites, (2) unsuitable wind energy sites, (3) place attachment, (4) recre... More

Figure 5. This illustrates the second step of the agreement analysis involving the calculation of ratio of the mapped meaningful places and the other layers for each attitude group. The darker the mapped area, the higher is the agreement ratio between the compared layers. Alternatively, the higher... More

Figure 1. Maximum return to nitrogen example tipping point. Source: Iowa State University Agronomy Extension and Outreach (2022) . Notes: A calculated MRTN curve and tipping point, using hypothetical corn and N prices. The return line depicts the economic returns from applying higher rates of N, ... More