Figure 1. Sky Group’s baseline carbon emissions in 2018, 2019, and 2020 ( Sky Group, 2021b ). More

Figure 2. Total Sky Group waste (tonnes) 2020 ( Sky Group, 2021b ). More

Figure 3. On-site Sky Group renewable energy (MWh) 2020 ( Sky Group, 2021b ). More

Figure 4. Emissions ( t CO 2 e) produced from Sky Group transport 2020 ( Sky Group, 2021b ). More

Figure 1. The organisational boundary, defined by the dashed line clearly demonstrated where emissions are derived from for the Qantas Group within this report. More

Figure 2. Qantas total Scope 1 emissions from the financial year 2009–2020. Data accessed from the Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator [ 13 ]. More

Figure 3. Qantas and Virgin airlines total Scopes 1 and 2 emissions per million revenue-passenger kilometers. This shows how much emissions are used on each kilometer travelled by a passenger. More

Figure 4. Qantas total Scope 2 emissions from the financial years 2009–2020. Data accessed from the Australian Government Clean Energy Regulator [ 13 ]. More

Figure 5. The amount of land fill in tonnes produced by Qantas between 2014 and 2020. More

Figure 6. The fuel efficiency of Qantas and Virgin per 100 revenue tonne kilometers over the past 3 years. More

Figure 7. Carbon targets framework depicting the categories that contribute to environmental performance. More

Figure 1. The South Padre Island hurricane evacuation bottleneck in Cameron county. Source: Cameron County, “Hurricane Evacuation Tips Map Interior,” http://www.co.cameron.tx.us/evacuation_maps.php . More

Figure 2. The Cameron County Regional Mobility Authority’s (CCRMA) proposed second access route across the Laguna Madre. Source: CCRMA, “South Padre Island 2nd Access Project, Public Scoping Meeting,” slide presentation, South Padre Island Convention Centre, July 17, 2012. More

Figure 1. The Black Sea country boundaries (Data: ArcGIS Online). More

Figure 2. The river basins draining in the Black Sea (Data: ArcGIS Online). More