In this case study, we explore the Trump Administration’s 2018 “Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science” rule and investigate it as an example of the politics associated with how science is used in the regulatory process in the United States. Publicly, the administration claimed the rule would improve data and scientific quality, as well as lead to greater transparency in regulatory decisions made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule’s many critics, including many scientific organizations and environmental groups, argued instead however that the rule was politically motivated, and only the latest attempt of many by regulated industries to interfere in the EPA’s use of science in its regulatory analysis and decision-making. They argued the true goal of the rule was instead to impede the agency’s mission by restricting its use of key public health studies and slowing its operations. The rule, which took effect in January 2021, was quickly vacated when the Biden Administration took office. Although this rule is no longer in place, it provides an illustrative example of the complicated relationship between politics and science, as well as of a political strategy often used by industry actors and political conservatives to avoid environmental regulations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Article Case|
November 14 2022
The Politicization of Regulatory Science: Science Transparency at the Trump Administration’s EPA
Rose Zappacosta,
Rose Zappacosta
1Joseph R. Biden School of Public Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Casey L. Taylor
1Joseph R. Biden School of Public Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Email: [email protected]
Case Studies in the Environment (2022) 6 (1): 1800281.
Citation
Rose Zappacosta, Casey L. Taylor; The Politicization of Regulatory Science: Science Transparency at the Trump Administration’s EPA. Case Studies in the Environment 4 January 2022; 6 (1): 1800281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2022.1800281
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.