As the major group of herbivorous insects, moths are highly significant in natural ecosystems. In collaboration with the Papua New Guinea (PNG) multipurpose National Forest Inventory (NFI) survey, this study investigates the species richness, distribution and community composition of Geometrid moths (Lepidoptera) in PNG’s tropical forests and analyses environmental drivers of the geometrid community structure. By providing a baseline assessment of an important order of insects that can serve as an indicator for broader biodiversity, this study informs how biodiversity assessments can be better integrated into the planning of forest conservation initiatives, particularly those related to REDD+ and forest carbon offset developments. The research was conducted over 3 years at 38 NFI clusters throughout six provinces: Eastern Highlands, Western Highlands, Morobe, Madang and West New Britain and Central Province. Moths were collected from dusk to before midnight (18:00 h to 22:00 h) using a manual light trapping method for four nights per site, with a total of 152 light trap samples. Results included a total of 11,830 specimens from 1,108 morphological species from lowland and montane forests in disturbed (degraded and/or logged) and primary forests. Elevation and forest disturbance are the main variables that influence the distribution of species. Species richness was low in montane undisturbed forests compared with lowland (disturbed and primary) forests and montane disturbed forests. Species similarity between light trap samples tends to decrease as elevation increases. Geometrid moth species were arranged into two main orders of community composition according to the forest types: montane (disturbed and/or primary) forests species and lowland (disturbed and/or primary forest) species as per the samples.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Article Case|
March 09 2022
Geometrid Moth Species Richness, Distribution and Community Composition in Different Forest Types of Papua New Guinea
Collections:
Special Collection: Papua New Guinea's Forests
Jason Paliau,
1School of Environment and Climate Change, Papua New Guinea University of Natural Resources and Environment, East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea
2New Guinea Binatang Research Center (NGBRC), Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
Email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Alfred Mani,
Alfred Mani
2New Guinea Binatang Research Center (NGBRC), Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
Search for other works by this author on:
Lui Napa,
Lui Napa
2New Guinea Binatang Research Center (NGBRC), Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
Search for other works by this author on:
Cassey Uvau,
Cassey Uvau
2New Guinea Binatang Research Center (NGBRC), Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven Sau,
Steven Sau
2New Guinea Binatang Research Center (NGBRC), Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Kiapranis,
Robert Kiapranis
3Papua New Guinea Forest Research Institute (PNGFRI), Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Dargusch,
Paul Dargusch
4School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Fabio Attorre,
Fabio Attorre
5Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Vojtěch Novotný
Vojtěch Novotný
2New Guinea Binatang Research Center (NGBRC), Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
6Institute of Entomology, Czech Academy of Sciences and Biological Faculty, University of South Bohemia, South Bohemia, Czech Republic
Search for other works by this author on:
Email: [email protected]
Case Studies in the Environment (2022) 6 (1): 1474225.
Citation
Jason Paliau, Alfred Mani, Lui Napa, Cassey Uvau, Steven Sau, Robert Kiapranis, Paul Dargusch, Fabio Attorre, Vojtěch Novotný; Geometrid Moth Species Richness, Distribution and Community Composition in Different Forest Types of Papua New Guinea. Case Studies in the Environment 4 January 2022; 6 (1): 1474225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2022.1474225
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.