The recent controversy over commercial uses on parkland at Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS) has inspired this case study, which seeks to explore the integration of park residents into decision-making processes of the United States National Parks system. Specifically, this research evaluates the tensions between the various users at PRNS and explores the potential impact of a citizen’s advisory commission at PRNS in terms of increasing interactions between the National Park Service (NPS), park residents, and the public. To carry out these objectives, this case study compares recent interactions at Point Reyes with those that took place during previous decades when an active citizens advisory commission was in place. This case study finds that the advisory commission at Point Reyes played a vital role as an intermediary, which facilitated productive interactions between the key local community, residents, and NPS.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Article Case|
December 31 2019
More than “The Public”: A Case Study of Resident Inclusion in Decision-Making at Point Reyes National Seashore
Collections:
Special Collection: Parks and Conservation
Megan Foster,
1Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, United States
Email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Laura Alice Watt
Laura Alice Watt
2Department of Geography, Environment, and Planning, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Email: [email protected]
Case Studies in the Environment (2019) 3 (1): 1–9.
Citation
Megan Foster, Laura Alice Watt; More than “The Public”: A Case Study of Resident Inclusion in Decision-Making at Point Reyes National Seashore. Case Studies in the Environment 31 December 2019; 3 (1): 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2019.002071
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
290
Views