Social acceptability appears as a new public norm that major projects must meet in order to be authorized and realized. This article proposes to analyze the case of a wind farm project in the municipality of St-Valentin, Quebec, Canada near the border with Vermont, which was cancelled by the government due to lack of social acceptance, in order to illustrate the importance of this norm today. The project involved the construction of 25 turbines to generate 52 MW of power. Launched in 2006, the project was already significantly under way by 2008; however, in 2011, the government permanently shelved it. Through a combination of document analysis and 11 interviews, we identified the main reasons for the lack of social acceptability: lack of upstream consultation from the developer and wrong scale planned for the consultation process, controversies surrounding the public decision-making process, profound contradictions between the community’s values and interests and the nature of the project, and perceptions of the impacts on the landscape and conflicting uses. For better project social acceptability, lessons learned from this case suggest from a procedural perspective opting for broad, open, and early consultation, prioritizing a regional scale for the approach and acting with transparency, clear rules and a concern for building an ongoing relationship with stakeholders. From a more substantive perspective, our analysis points to the importance of factoring in the level of compatibility between the nature of the project and the values and interests shared by stakeholders in the community, and planning potential modifications to adapt the project to the context in light of their demands.
Skip Nav Destination
Article Case| December 31 2018
Socially Not Acceptable: Lessons from a Wind Farm Project in St-Valentin, Quebec
Case Studies in the Environment (2018) 2 (1): 1–10.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Louis Simard; Socially Not Acceptable: Lessons from a Wind Farm Project in St-Valentin, Quebec. Case Studies in the Environment 31 December 2018; 2 (1): 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2018.001354
Download citation file: