This article assesses the legal and institutional framework around governance of wetlands and wetland-related ecosystem services in Harare, the capital city of Zimbabwe (member of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands). A mixed research methodology, comprising review of literature, interviews, document analysis, and Geographical Information Systems, forms the key methodology used in this study. Results from analyzed data show that lack of a clear and harmonized legal and institutional framework is leading the Harare’s wetlands to rapidly shrink and affecting their ability to provide key ecosystem services, such as clean water, flood protection, recreational areas, and wildlife. In addition, both overlapping roles and functions among the various institutions and legislations are responsible for wetland management in Harare. Key recommendation emerging from the study points to the need to define clear boundaries and harmonization of key legislations to promote the sustainability of wetlands in Harare.
Harare’s Deteriorating Wetlands: Why Sound Policies and Legislations Are Not Enough
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Abraham R. Matamanda, Innocent Chirisa, Billy B. Mukamuri, Privilege Kaduwo, Magret Mhlanga; Harare’s Deteriorating Wetlands: Why Sound Policies and Legislations Are Not Enough. Case Studies in the Environment 31 December 2018; 2 (1): 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2018.001198
Download citation file: