State authorities in Croatia and Slovenia have recently indiscriminately designated Tito’s Yugoslavia as totalitarian without reservations. Neither of these authorities referred to any systematic considerations of totalitarianism, nor did they analyze the manner of the alleged system’s presence and its time limits. The current paper indicates that, from the middle of the 60s, millions of copies of religious newspapers were published and economic enterprises operated beyond the state command economy. In addition, the republics were largely autonomous players and catered for their own interests. Although Tito’s cult was promoted, his power was limited by the federal nature of the state. Neither any other elements of totalitarianism could be found.
Research Article| May 22 2014
Was Tito’s Yugoslavia totalitarian?
* Corresponding author.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2014) 47 (2): 237–245.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Tools Icon Tools
- Search Site
Sergej Flere, Rudi Klanjšek; Was Tito’s Yugoslavia totalitarian?. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2014; 47 (2): 237–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.04.009
Download citation file: