Hegemonic parties in authoritarian regimes can fulfill important purposes for those regimes and thereby contribute to their survival. Along with the consolidation of authoritarian regimes, hegemonic political parties have emerged in some post-Soviet states, raising questions about the role that these parties play in the survival of the regimes. This article asks which of the purposes that are frequently ascribed to ruling authoritarian parties are fulfilled by United Russia, the Yeni Azerbaijan Party, and Nur Otan of Kazakhstan, the hegemonic parties of the three strongest consolidated authoritarian regimes with a hegemonic party in the former Soviet Union. It is argued that despite the increasing prominence of the hegemonic parties, full-fledged party-based authoritarianism has not yet been established in Russia, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan.
Hegemonic political parties in post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards party-based authoritarianism?
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Tools Icon Tools
- Search Site
Max Bader; Hegemonic political parties in post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards party-based authoritarianism?. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 189–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.07.002
Download citation file: