This paper addresses the question of world order by considering how Western military actions in Yugoslavia were perceived from a different cultural perspective. It traces how the NATO-led bombing campaign during March–June of 1999 affected various visions of world order that had existed in Russia before the campaign and describes the discursive change this campaign produced. The argument is made that Russia's foreign policy elites, from Westernizers to Neo-Communists and Expansionists, perceived Western goals in Yugoslavia differently from their counterparts in the West. However, they differed in their recommendations regarding Russia's response and lessons to be drawn from the Kosovo crisis. The paper also identifies several points where the different perspectives can converge. More specifically, all Russian schools of thought viewed the NATO campaign as a dangerous precedent potentially destabilizing the existing world order. They also shared the conviction that Russia should play a larger role in world affairs and that without Russia's involvement there could be no peace and stability in the Balkans and in Europe. They point to the United Nations as the only forum for debating the legitimacy of military interventions and for preventing interventions carried out without the approval of the UN.
The final triumph of the Pax Americana? Western intervention in Yugoslavia and Russia's debate on the post-Cold War order
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Andrei P. Tsygankov; The final triumph of the Pax Americana? Western intervention in Yugoslavia and Russia's debate on the post-Cold War order. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2001; 34 (2): 133–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00008-3
Download citation file: