Many of the well-established methods used by ethnographers to protect participants in risky or authoritarian environments—such as destroying fieldnotes or building composite identities—are at odds with a growing demand for transparency in the social sciences. Ethnographers who employ extreme anonymization in order to study sensitive topics thus find themselves out of lockstep with this scholarly trend and must justify their methodology to an increasingly skeptical audience. Engaging with some of the literature on ethical data collection, storage, and publication, this article considers the balance that ethnographers must strike between anonymization and expectations of data transparency. The article was developed out of the author’s own preparation for ethnographic research on Russian LGBTQ+ activism, drawing on existing practices used by journalists, activists, and criminologists. While publications on danger and fieldwork are not new, ethnographers must now take digital threats into account when safeguarding sensitive data. Despite this need for information security, there are no established best practices for social scientists or ethnographers working in authoritarian environments. While recognizing that there is no “one size fits all” solution, this article outlines practical steps that ethnographers should consider before embarking on risky fieldwork. While the suggestions and precautions outlined in this article are intended for ethnographers working in authoritarian contexts, they can be applied to other forms of qualitative research as well.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
March 17 2025
Putting Paranoia into Practice: Information Security for Ethnographers in Authoritarian Contexts
Talia Kollek
The Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
email: [email protected]
Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1–21.
Citation
Talia Kollek; Putting Paranoia into Practice: Information Security for Ethnographers in Authoritarian Contexts. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 2025; doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2025.2471044
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.