Of Ukraine’s six presidential transitions, only those in 2010 and 2019 proceeded entirely as envisioned in the constitution. In several cases, elections and transitions resulted from ad hoc arrangements made to address political crises. In one case, street protests forced the rerunning of elections seen as rigged, and in another street protests led to the departure of a president whose election had been seen as free and fair. In some cases, procedures that were entirely improvised were widely seen as legitimate, while in other cases established formal procedures were insufficient to legitimize a leader’s rule. This raises the question of how elections and legitimacy interact. Under what conditions are elections sufficient to legitimate rule, and in what cases are they insufficient? Under what circumstances do non-legal means of changing rulers gain popular legitimacy? By reviewing Ukraine’s seven presidential elections and six transitions of power, this article explores variation in the power of elections as a legitimating force.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2024
Research Article|
October 20 2023
Elections, Succession, and Legitimacy in Ukraine: Lessons from Six Presidential Transitions
Paul D’Anieri
University of California, Riverside, California, USA
email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
email: [email protected]
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2024) 57 (4): 6–27.
Citation
Paul D’Anieri; Elections, Succession, and Legitimacy in Ukraine: Lessons from Six Presidential Transitions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 December 2024; 57 (4): 6–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2023.2001608
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.