In this article, we study the subnational variation in the deployment of the politically motivated coercion during Aleksei Navalny’s 2017–18 presidential campaign in Russia. We posit that the strategic consideration behind the use of coercion helps to explain why some subnational authorities relied heavily on repressive tactics while others abstained from it. As regime agents aim at preventing mobilization from escalating, in resource abundant localities they must be more proactive. Also, they have to develop organizational capacities and overcome political constraints. Hence, we expect higher intensity of repression in the cities where propensity and capacity to repress are higher, and constraints are lower. We test these propositions against the data on the incidents of coercion in 159 cities and find some tentative support for this theory.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2023
Research Article|
May 05 2023
Subnational Coercion during Aleksei Navalny’s Presidential Campaign in Russia
Andrei Semenov,
Ronald F. Inglehart Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, Department of Politics and International Relations, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation
email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Elizaveta Popkova
Elizaveta Popkova
Faculty of Political Science, European University at St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Search for other works by this author on:
email: [email protected]
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2023) 56 (2): 105–135.
Citation
Andrei Semenov, Elizaveta Popkova; Subnational Coercion during Aleksei Navalny’s Presidential Campaign in Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2023; 56 (2): 105–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2023.1818445
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.