In competitive authoritarian systems, aspiring autocrats must win elections and marginalize the political opposition. In Belarus, President Alexander Lukashenko’s strategy for political hegemony heavily relied on socioeconomic co-optation, offering privileges to supporters and imposing sanctions on dissenters. In an economy dominated by the state, co-optation had a coercive effect on behavior. Without sizable areas of activity autonomous from the government, citizens could not defy or mitigate the cost of reprisals for openly supporting the political opposition. Through co-optation, Lukashenko weakened the opposition and built an authoritarian regime without resorting to extensive political violence, which could have undermined his claim of public legitimacy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2021
Research Article|
December 01 2021
The Political Economy of Autocratization: The Case of Belarus, 1994–2006 Available to Purchase
Aris Trantidis
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
email: [email protected]
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2021) 54 (4): 117–136.
Citation
Aris Trantidis; The Political Economy of Autocratization: The Case of Belarus, 1994–2006. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 December 2021; 54 (4): 117–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2021.54.4.117
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.