Digital authoritarianism threatens the privacy and rights of Internet users worldwide, yet scholarship on this topic remains limited in analytical power and case selection. In this article, we introduce a comprehensive analytical framework to the field of Internet governance and apply it first, briefly, to the well-known case of China and then, in more depth, to the still-understudied Russian case. We identify the extent and relative centralization of Internet governance as well as proactive versus reactive approaches to governance as notable differences between the cases, highlighting variation among digital authoritarians’ governance strategies. We conclude that Russia’s Internet governance model is less comprehensive and consistent than China’s, but its components may be more easily exported to other political systems. We then consider whether recent changes to Russia’s Internet governance suggest that it could converge with the Chinese model over time.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2021
Research Article|
December 01 2021
Varieties of Digital Authoritarianism: Analyzing Russia’s Approach to Internet Governance
Laura Howells,
Laura Howells
Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Laura A. Henry
Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, USA
email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
email: [email protected]
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2021) 54 (4): 1–27.
Citation
Laura Howells, Laura A. Henry; Varieties of Digital Authoritarianism: Analyzing Russia’s Approach to Internet Governance. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 December 2021; 54 (4): 1–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2021.54.4.1
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.