It is established that Party-army relation followed a “separated” pattern in the Soviet Union as opposed to an “infused” pattern in China. This article explores the historical origin of this difference in the revolutionary periods. By analyzing the biographies of communist military elites, it argues that this discrepancy took shape before the revolutionary takeover and resulted from the differentiated intensities of warfare across Russia and China. In China, the numerous civil wars and military defeats, radicalized the old military structure and boosted societal militarization; thus, eroding the mutual exclusion between the military and revolutionaries. The effect was lesser in Tsarist Russia than in prerevolutionary China, making the old military a conservative and professional corporate that the Bolsheviks could not completely subordinate to Party control.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2019
Research Article|
July 26 2019
Historical origins of the party-army relations in the Soviet Union and China Available to Purchase
Luyang Zhou
Luyang Zhou
*
Brown University, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA
* Corresponding author. E-mail address:[email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
* Corresponding author. E-mail address:[email protected].
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2019) 52 (3): 197–207.
Citation
Luyang Zhou; Historical origins of the party-army relations in the Soviet Union and China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 September 2019; 52 (3): 197–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.07.006
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.