The article analyzes authoritarian regimes within the post-Soviet territory in terms of informal practices (clannishness, clientelism and patronage) and their characteristics used by political leaders to form a power coalition. It has been argued that any of these informal practices determine a power coalition of a certain size, which is consequential for regime sustainability. Power coalitions formed on the basis of a clan-like nature is the least effective way to retain power and generally leads to regime destabilization. Clientelism, which allows for forming a power coalition on a wider basis, is a more effective strategy in terms of regime sustainability. Maximum regime sustainability is reached when patronage practices are used, which require more material resources and are only accessible to a limited number of wealthy states.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 30 2019
Neo-patrimonial practices and sustainability of authoritarian regimes in Eurasia
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2019) 52 (2): 169–176.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Stanislav N. Shkel; Neo-patrimonial practices and sustainability of authoritarian regimes in Eurasia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2019; 52 (2): 169–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.04.002
Download citation file: