Though vilified as instances of “parliamentary putsch,” no-confidence censure motions remain significant constitutional tools through which the opposition can challenge the government in Romania, and publicly underscore its policy ineffectiveness in certain areas of activity. An overview of censure motions debated in the Romanian parliament from 1989 to 2012 reveals that center-left cabinets faced fewer challenges than their centerright counterparts, anti-communist forces were less skilled in articulating criticisms against cabinets, not all adopted motions led to cabinet removal, and motions became increasingly complex over time. Two motions adopted in 2009 and 2012, tabled by the center-left opposition against center-right cabinets, turned these parliamentary tools into powerful censure instruments.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2015
Research Article|
September 18 2015
Between democracy and putsch? — Censure motions in Romania (1989–2012) Available to Purchase
Lavinia Stan
Lavinia Stan
Department of Political Science, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2015) 48 (4): 291–300.
Citation
Lavinia Stan; Between democracy and putsch? — Censure motions in Romania (1989–2012). Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 December 2015; 48 (4): 291–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.09.001
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.