The idea of redrawing the borders between the republics of the region remains a topic of discussion beyond its borders. While the Kremlin de facto makes the subject of territorial changes in the North Caucasus taboo, the processes related to the rise of ethnic selfconsciousness in ethnic republics hardly stopped. The Syrian crisis, which gave Russia a much-celebrated diplomatic victory, threatens its territorial integrity because Moscow’s mishandling of the Circassian issue is radicalizing the Circassian communities of the North Caucasus. Drawing on the dynamics of ethnic mobilization among Circassians, the paper argues that this process may result in the most dangerous consequences of the Kremlin’s policies based on the ancient imperial principle of “divide and rule” — redrawing the administrative map of the entire region. The paper concludes that even though Moscow pretends that the situation is under control, a shift which consequences are hard to predict is already happening. One of them is that the demand for an increased congruency between Russia’s ethnic and administrative borders becomes politically salient; and a protrusion in the battle line becomes more prominent with each passing day.
How far is too far? Circassian ethnic mobilization and the redrawing of internal borders in the North Caucasus
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Marat Grebennikov; How far is too far? Circassian ethnic mobilization and the redrawing of internal borders in the North Caucasus. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 March 2015; 48 (1): 71–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.01.003
Download citation file: