A prominent view in political science is that electoral uncertainty leads institutional designers to prefer independent and powerful courts. Yet few scholars have examined the design of constitutional courts systematically across Eastern Europe and those who have employed the results of elections held after constitutions were adopted to estimate the actors’ perceptions of the balance of power prior to the court’s design. This work reevaluates the effects of electoral uncertainty in post-communist Europe using more appropriate data and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to outline the different causal configurations linking electoral uncertainty to the initial judicial empowerment.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2013 The Regents of the University of California. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
2013
The Regents of the University of California
You do not currently have access to this content.