This paper presents research findings based on a factorial survey study of attitudes toward the justice of income distribution in Ukraine. The factorial survey design was used for the first time in a representative large-scale survey in Ukraine and provided an opportunity to investigate the effect of multiple factors concerning individual, family and enterprise characteristics in complex subjective evaluations of just earnings. The focus within this study lays on three fundamental principles, according to which the just income is assessed: equality, desert and need principles. Empirical results of the study show that Ukrainian respondents pay attention to almost all characteristics used in the vignettes, a fact which empirically supported the basic idea of the multiprinciple justice theory. Some generational differences in justice perception were uncovered and discussed. The analyses also revealed an overall domination of the need principle in the judgments on income justice. However, the need criterion loses its relative significance at the expense of the desert principle, as soon as rather large income amounts are treated. This finding leads to the reflection that the need considerations appear to be popular in the post-Soviet countries to the extent to which they find support among low-income population and not because of the Soviet ideological heritage.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 23 2013
Distributive justice attitudes in Ukraine: Need, desert or social minimum?
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2013) 46 (2): 227–241.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Kseniia Gatskova; Distributive justice attitudes in Ukraine: Need, desert or social minimum?. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2013; 46 (2): 227–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.03.007
Download citation file: