This article examines the ways in which various Russian NGOs, involved in litigation at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), have worked to advocate for improved domestic implementation of rulings made by the Court. The paper traces these advocacy activities in four key problem areas for Russia’s implementation of the Convention: (1) domestic judges’ knowledge and citation of the European Convention or ECtHR case law; (2) the execution of domestic court judgments by Russian state bureaucratic bodies; (3) extrajudicial disappearances and killings in anti-terrorist military operations in the North Caucasus; and (4) torture or inhumane treatment in police detention. The author finds that the impact Russian NGOs can have upon domestic implementation depends greatly upon the professional cultures and incentives of the actors involved as well as whether or not prevention of violations is compatible with other high-level Russian government agendas.
Advocacy beyond litigation: Examining Russian NGO efforts on implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom; Advocacy beyond litigation: Examining Russian NGO efforts on implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 December 2012; 45 (3-4): 255–268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.06.003
Download citation file: