In Kyrgyzstan, nationalism combines a narrative on the titular ethnic group and its relation to a civic, state-based, identity, feelings of imperiled sovereignty, and a rising electorate agenda for political forces. Nationalism has therefore become the engine of an interpretative framework for Kyrgyzstan’s failures and enables the society indirectly to formulate its perception of threat, both on the Uzbek and Kyrgyz sides. To this end, this article first analyzes the double identity narrative, civic and ethnic, of Akayev’s regime, followed by the transformation toward a more ethno-centered Kyrgyz patriotism under Bakiyev, the growing role of the theme of imperiled sovereignty—which culminated with the events in Osh—and how nationalism is today becoming a key element of the political agenda and the public scene.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2012
Editors
Research Article|
March 29 2012
The paradigm of nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving narrative, the sovereignty issue, and political agenda
Marlène Laruelle
Marlène Laruelle
Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies, The Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2012) 45 (1-2): 39–49.
Citation
Marlène Laruelle; The paradigm of nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving narrative, the sovereignty issue, and political agenda. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2012; 45 (1-2): 39–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.02.002
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.