In Kyrgyzstan, nationalism combines a narrative on the titular ethnic group and its relation to a civic, state-based, identity, feelings of imperiled sovereignty, and a rising electorate agenda for political forces. Nationalism has therefore become the engine of an interpretative framework for Kyrgyzstan’s failures and enables the society indirectly to formulate its perception of threat, both on the Uzbek and Kyrgyz sides. To this end, this article first analyzes the double identity narrative, civic and ethnic, of Akayev’s regime, followed by the transformation toward a more ethno-centered Kyrgyz patriotism under Bakiyev, the growing role of the theme of imperiled sovereignty—which culminated with the events in Osh—and how nationalism is today becoming a key element of the political agenda and the public scene.
The paradigm of nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving narrative, the sovereignty issue, and political agenda
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Marlène Laruelle; The paradigm of nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving narrative, the sovereignty issue, and political agenda. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2012; 45 (1-2): 39–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.02.002
Download citation file: