The empirical case studies of this special issue not only provide an illuminating insight into the dynamic of political processes within the post-Soviet de facto states, they also contribute to the discussion of possible links between different strategies of state-building and the success or failure of democratization. Summing up the main findings of the issue, this article carves out the similarities and the differences in the internal political trajectories of the non-recognized but quite stable entities under analysis. Despite sometimes contradicting empirical evidence, one central outcome is clear: the established theoretical assumption that uncontested external sovereignty is a necessary precondition for internal democratization needs to be reconsidered.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2012
Editors
Research Article|
April 25 2012
Incomplete state building – incomplete democracy? How to interpret internal political development in the post-Soviet de facto states. Conclusion.
Silvia von Steinsdorff
Silvia von Steinsdorff
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2012) 45 (1-2): 201–206.
Citation
Silvia von Steinsdorff; Incomplete state building – incomplete democracy? How to interpret internal political development in the post-Soviet de facto states. Conclusion.. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2012; 45 (1-2): 201–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.03.010
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.