Post-Soviet de facto states are presented in the social science literature, first of all, as a by-product of research on secession, nationalism, and conflict resolution. The paper focuses instead on issues of institution-building and governance in de facto states. It examines the construction of a hybrid political regime in the most populous of post-Soviet de facto states, Transnistra. The paper analyzes secessionist elites’ strategies of maintaining power and sources of domestic pressures to democratize political institutions of the de facto state. The evolution of the Transnistrian regime, it is argued, provides interesting ground for exploring the mechanisms of democratization under an unfavorable choice of institutions and problematic external environment.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2012
Editors
Research Article|
April 01 2012
Secession and hybrid regime politics in transnistria Available to Purchase
Oleh Protsyk
Oleh Protsyk
*
European Studies Program, University of Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany
* Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
* Corresponding author.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2012) 45 (1-2): 175–182.
Citation
Oleh Protsyk; Secession and hybrid regime politics in transnistria. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2012; 45 (1-2): 175–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.03.003
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.