Hegemonic parties in authoritarian regimes can fulfill important purposes for those regimes and thereby contribute to their survival. Along with the consolidation of authoritarian regimes, hegemonic political parties have emerged in some post-Soviet states, raising questions about the role that these parties play in the survival of the regimes. This article asks which of the purposes that are frequently ascribed to ruling authoritarian parties are fulfilled by United Russia, the Yeni Azerbaijan Party, and Nur Otan of Kazakhstan, the hegemonic parties of the three strongest consolidated authoritarian regimes with a hegemonic party in the former Soviet Union. It is argued that despite the increasing prominence of the hegemonic parties, full-fledged party-based authoritarianism has not yet been established in Russia, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2011
Research Article|
August 06 2011
Hegemonic political parties in post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards party-based authoritarianism? Available to Purchase
Max Bader
Max Bader
Geschwister Scholl Institute for Political Science, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Oettingenstrasse 67, 80538 Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2011) 44 (3): 189–197.
Citation
Max Bader; Hegemonic political parties in post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards party-based authoritarianism?. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 189–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.07.002
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.