In 2003–2005, democratic revolutions overthrew the Georgian, Ukrainian, and Kyrgyz post-Soviet authoritarian regimes. However, disillusioned citizens witness today their new leaders creating a Bonapartist regime, entering into open conflict with former revolutionary allies or being forced to accept cohabitation with leaders of the previous regime. This article argues that despite internationally acclaimed civic mobilisation, civil society's weakness seriously affected the three revolutionary processes. These were in fact initiated, led, controlled, and finally subordinated by former members of the authoritarian regimes' political elite. Finally, the supposedly democratic revolutions proved to be little more than a limited rotation of ruling elites within undemocratic political systems.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| August 13 2007
Rose, Orange, and Tulip: The failed post-Soviet revolutions
Theodor Tudoroiu *
Institut d'études européennes Université de Montréal-McGill University, 3744, rue Jean-Brillant, Bureau 525-18, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1P1 Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2007) 40 (3): 315–342.
Theodor Tudoroiu; Rose, Orange, and Tulip: The failed post-Soviet revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 September 2007; 40 (3): 315–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.06.005
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.