The aim of this paper is to explore the various views of the social policy elites in the Baltic States concerning family policy and, in particular, family benefits as one of the possible explanations for the observed policy differences. This study is based on semi-structured expert interviews from the three Baltic countries conducted in 2002. The qualitative analyses indicate that the Baltic States differ significantly with regard to the reasons behind their family policies. Lithuanian decision-makers seek to reduce poverty among families with children and enhance parents’ responsibility for bringing up their children. Latvian policy-makers act so as to increase the birth rate and create equal opportunities for children from all families. Policies that seek to create equal opportunities for all children and the desire to enhance gender equality was more visible in the case of Estonia in comparison with the other two countries. This study thus indicate how intimately the attitudes of top-level bureaucrats, policy-makers and researchers shape social policy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2006
Research Article|
October 20 2005
Reforming family policy in the Baltic States: The views of the elites Available to Purchase
Jolanta Aidukaite
Jolanta Aidukaite
*
University College of South Stockholm, 141 89 Huddinge, Sweden
* Tel.: +46 8 608 4293; fax: +46 8 608 4360. E-mail address:[email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
* Tel.: +46 8 608 4293; fax: +46 8 608 4360. E-mail address:[email protected]
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2006) 39 (1): 1–23.
Citation
Jolanta Aidukaite; Reforming family policy in the Baltic States: The views of the elites. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 March 2006; 39 (1): 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.09.004
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.