The article surveys and discusses different definitions of regime type in Ukraine and whether they provide a sound understanding of the regime emerging in Ukraine and other CIS states since the late 1990s. Ukraine and the CIS witnessed democratic regression and therefore could not be assumed that they were on a ‘transition’ path to a consolidated democracy. The majority of CIS states have either already moved to fully authoritarian regimes, such as Russia. Or, like Ukraine, they remained as unstable competitive authoritarian regimes which exhibited a ‘hybrid’ fusion of the former Soviet system and the emerging reformed economy and polity. Ukraine’s oligarchs during Kuchma’s second term preferred a fully authoritarian regime but they were also divided among themselves and faced a formidable opposition. These factors blocked the creation of a fully authoritarian regime under Kuchma and led to the victory of the opposition through Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 2005
Regime type and politics in Ukraine under Kuchma
Taras Kuzio *
Institute for European Russian and Eurasian Studies, George Washington University, 1957 E Street NW, Suite 412, Washington, DC 20052, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2005) 38 (2): 167–190.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Taras Kuzio; Regime type and politics in Ukraine under Kuchma. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 June 2005; 38 (2): 167–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.03.007
Download citation file: