The essay argues that Western scholars can improve their understanding of the post-Soviet Russia by studying the discipline of new Russian international relations (IR). The other objective of the essay is to move away from the excessively West-centered IR scholarship by exploring indigenous Russian perceptions and inviting a dialogue across the globe. The essay identifies key trends in Russian IR reflective of the transitional nature of Russia’s post-Soviet change. It argues that Russian IR continues to be in a stage of ideological and theoretical uncertainty, which is a result of unresolved questions of national identity. For describing Russia’s identity crisis, the authors employ Erving Goffman’s concept of stigma defined as a crisis of a larger social acceptance by Russia’s ‘‘significant other’’ (West). The essay suggests that, until this crisis is resolved, much of Russian IR debates can be understood in terms of a search for a national idea. It also introduces the authors of the issue and summarizes their contribution to our understanding of Russian and Western IR.
New directions in Russian international studies: pluralization, Westernization, and isolationism
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Andrei P. Tsygankov, Pavel A. Tsygankov; New directions in Russian international studies: pluralization, Westernization, and isolationism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1 March 2004; 37 (1): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2003.12.005
Download citation file: